| James Bond: More Morally Responsible Than Superman |
|
|
|
| Written by Arya Ponto | |||||||||||
| Wednesday, 05 November 2008 | |||||||||||
|
Quantum of Solace director Marc Foster told New York Mag that writer Paul Haggis offered an idea that was rejected for the film, one that would've made 007 a daddy.
This is the same problem that made that subplot in Superman Returns so mind-boggling. Why introduce a son for him when you know it could only end with one of two bad choices? Of course they have to reboot the series now, because otherwise we'd get a sequel called Man of Steel, But No Reliability. Makes you glad that the Broccolis are smarter than them with Bond. It's a dumb idea for a movie franchise character because it's a no-win situation. If he takes care of the kid, then future movies would have an irresponsible father who willingly puts himself in extreme danger, jetsetting around the world bedding women for days on end while a kid waits at home. If he doesn't take care of the kid, then he's an absent dad. Either way, it makes him a skeevy asshat. Now, Craig's version of Bond isn't exactly a thoroughly moral character and is kind of a dick, so although it's questionable and up for debate, abandoning a kid wouldn't be completely out of character for this guy. The problem is, who wants to see a James Bond movie where every once in a while it cuts from the action to a sad kid playing blocks by him/herself? Or having the lingering knowledge that somewhere out there is a kid yearning for to meet their biological dad? That's just depressing.
Set as favorite
Email This
Share This
Trackback(0)
Comments (3)
![]()
November 06, 2008,
Lex Walker
said:
|
![]() |
Hahaaha the idea of cutting to a sad kid playing with blocks makes me laugh. Also fun: twisting the exploding pen slightly too far while trying to learn cursive. |
|
Votes: +1 |
November 07, 2008,
Ben Redwood
said:
![]() |
Also the fact that babies tend to take a lot of time to incubate, last I heard. Vesper and Bond didn't have sex until sometime after Le Chiffre was disposed of. Now, they did indeed have their honeymoon period, Bond quitting the service etc. But how long could that have been? Can we really believe the bad guys (not to mention the British Treasury) would allow them to sit on all that cash for more than nine months? Can we really believe Bond, a spy, would not have noticed a large bump appearing on Vesper's abdomen? Can we really believe Bond, a sex maniac, would forgo his sex life in those crucial final months? And when did Vesper have this baby? Was it a water birth? I didn't even know Paul Haggis was involved with this movie. Now I'm somewhat worried. Suddenly Bond and all his enemies will decide, 'oh, why do we kill each other, we're all human beings!' and next you know it he'll be saving Blofeld from some car wreck. And this after he left the helpful Jaws and his innocent german midget to die on an exploding satellite. It's no wonder he drinks so much, harbouring all that guilt... |
|
Votes: +1 |
| < Older Article | Newer Article > |
|---|
What's Hot
- A Second Open Letter to Cliff Bleszinski and EPIC Games
- Top 10 Movies of 2008
- The Wrestler
- Netflix Changes Shipping Process
- The Tale of Despereaux
- McQuarrie, Singer Argue "Usual Suspects"
- Why "The Dark Knight" Shouldn't Win Best Picture
- WTF: Hentai-Inspired Soda
- Teaser Trailer for "Lesbian Vampire Killers"
- What We Missed This X'mas: Hindi "Memento"
Comments
- Watched this movie today, Its pretty kic...
- Oh thank God, that's more like it. The J...
- thanks for naming me

- Sorry, get your facts straight. NASA was...
- 100% awesome. Also, to Shayde, are you f...
- Far out.
- Anders Nelson, your point is well taken;...
- Let me clear the air of a couple of thin...
- You DO realize the site is satire, right...
- Then again, how often does the best film...


















